RSS FeedRSS FeedLivestreamLivestreamVimeoVimeoTwitterTwitterFacebook GroupFacebook Group
You are here: The Platypus Affiliated Society/Archive for author editor

On Monday, May 7th, Richard Wolin, distinguished Professor of History at the City University of New York Graduate Center, sat down with us to discuss his recent book The Wind from the East: French Intellectuals, the Cultural Revolution, and the Legacy of the 1960s.

The single-payer insurance model is the basis of the health care systems of other advanced industrial nations such as the United Kingdom and Canada, so what accounts for the apparent impracticality of achieving this reform in the United States? If the single-payer system is so much more rational and humane than the alternatives, why does it play such a marginal role in American politics? And if one is seriously committed to this reform, how might the situation change? Joining us on Radical Minds to discuss these questions and more is Helen Redmond, a medical social worker, independent journalist and a member of the Chicago Single Payer Action Network and the International Socialist Organization.

Interview conducted on April 24th, 2012 on the Radical Minds radio show.

The modern left

Defining leftist politics in modern movements

BY CALUM AGNEW, NEWS CONTRIBUTOR, DALHOUSIE GAZETTE
• MARCH 9, 2012

 

 

 

Andy Melathopoulos. Photo by Calum Agnew

What do the American anti-war movement, Occupy Wall Street, the sexual liberation movement, unions and an endangered semi-aquatic mammal from Australia all have in common?

The Platypus Affiliated Society at Dalhousie has been organizing events for the past six months, discussing the history of the political left and answering that question.

Motivated by a sense that the left is disoriented, the Platypus Society draws out the connections and points of disagreement between the various movements on the left-wing today and their historical predecessors, in the hopes of dispelling “ideological murkiness,” according to the website.

Andony Melathopoulos, Canadian coordinator of the Platypus Society and president of the Dal affiliate, hopes their work will prompt more thoughtful consideration about what it means to be on the left today.

On March 1, the group held a public interview between Herb Gamberg, a professor of sociology at Dal, and Tony Thomson from Acadia University, on the history of the New Communist movement in Halifax in the 1970s.

The society has organized six events this year with support from a variety of on-campus groups, such as the Contemporary Studies Society at the University of King’s College, the Dal Women’s Studies department and NSPIRG.  Some topics have included “Does Marxism Even Matter?,” “What is the #Occupy Movement?” and a film screening mini-series featuring Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps.

The group also meets twice weekly: once as a reading group, discussing the history of Marxist theory, and once to talk politics. The readings, which include texts from Hegel, Rousseau, Adorno and Horkheimer, are available online at the Platypus website.

The Platypus Society at Dal has been “trying to create the space where you can think critically. A space in which you don’t have to simply defend your positions but take them out and have a look at them,” says Melathopoulos.

“This isn’t your uncle’s turkey dinner,” he says. “You don’t have to worry and you don’t have to take your position for granted.”

It’s a place where students can hear a conversation that’s very different from what they’re used to, and where they can ask questions they’re not used to asking, says Melathopoulos.

For some, “it’s unclear why you would even need the category of the left at the moment,” he says. “I remember when we did our first event at Dal in September, we asked the question ‘What is the left?’ and the answer we got was, ‘Well, you support the CBC, healthcare and the unions.’”

Recently, movements such as Occupy Wall Street have rejected an association with the “traditional left.” But people have been announcing the death of the left for a long time, says Melathopoulos.

“If you understand the present in its historical context, you could recognize a left today,” says Melathopoulos.

In the case of Occupy, both the problem identified – macro-scale inequality – and the methodological debates in the movement itself, such as the problem of hierarchy, are not new, says Melathopoulos.

The Platypus Society believes that “if we understand the problem of the left as a historical one, that might help us in the present,” he says.

Melathopoulos doesn’t have a background in sociology or history. He’s a PhD student working with wild honeybees. He says the texts are “not that complicated if you just start reading them with an open mind.”

Founded in Chicago in 2006, the Platypus Society has chapters across the globe, including France, Korea, Greece and Toronto. The group publishes a monthly journal, *The Platypus Review*, which can be found in the atrium of the Killam and at cafés around Halifax. It has featured Noam Chomsky and Slavoj Žižek in the past.

The March issue contains an essay by former Dal student David Bush, writing on the Occupy movement.

As to the name, Marx’s friend and collaborator, Friedrich Engels, thought the platypus was a scheme cooked up by taxidermists in an attempt to discredit Darwin’s theory of evolution; such an animal was ridiculous and patently impossible in the light of natural history. The same is said of ‘the left’ today, says the Platypus Society.

And then Engels saw one.


Panel held on April 16th, 2012, in Boston, as part of the 3 Rs panel series.

Thanks to Doug Enaa Greene (http://www.youtube.com/user/dwgthed) for the video recording.

“After the failure of the 1960s New Left, the underlying despair with regard to the real efficacy of political will, of political agency, in a historical situation of heightened helplessness, became a self-constitution as outsider, as other, rather than an instrument of transformation. Focused on the bureaucratic stasis of the Fordist, late 20th Century world, the Left echoed the destruction of that world by the dynamics of capital: neoliberalism and globalization.

The idea of a fundamental transformation became bracketed and, instead, was replaced by the more ambiguous notion of ‘resistance.’ The notion of resistance, however, says little about the nature of that which is being resisted, or of the politics of the resistance involved.

‘Resistance’ is rarely based on a reflexive analysis of possibilities for fundamental change that are both generated and suppressed by the dynamic heteronomous order of capital. ‘Resistance’ is an undialectical category that does not grasp its own conditions of possibility; it fails to grasp the dynamic historical context of capital and its reconstitution of possibilities for both domination and emancipation, of which the ‘resisters’ do not recognize that that they are a part.”

— Moishe Postone, “History and Helplessness: Mass Mobilization and Contemporary Forms of Anticapitalism” (Public Culture¸ 18.1: 2006)

Reform, revolution, resistance: what kind of weight do these categories hold for the Left today? How are they used, to where do they point, and what is their history? Join the Platypus Affiliated Society for a discussion concerning a question that has renewed immediacy in light of the #Occupy movement.

Panelists:
Jeff Booth (Socialist Alternative)
Gayge (Common Struggle Libertarian Communist Federation)
Joe Ramsey (Kasama Project)
Laura Lee Schmidt (Platypus)
J. Phil Thompson (MIT)

II. Was ist “revolutionärer Marxismus”?

Zweiter Teil der Platypus Lesegruppe: Was ist die “Linke?” — Was ist “Marxismus?”


Immer Freitags um 16 Uhr. Erste Sitzung: 20.04

Goetheuniversität Frankfurt

Studierendenhaus, Campus Bockenheim

Mertonstr. 26-28

Beginn: Freitag, 20. April 2012 // Kontakt: frankfurt@platypus1917.org

Neueinsteiger sind herzlich wilkommen!


• vorausgesetzte / + empfohlene Texte


Woche 1.: 20. April 2012

• Rosa Luxemburg, Sozialreform oder Revolution (1899)

Woche 2.: 27. April

• W.I. LeninWas tun? (1902)
+ Richard Appignanesi and Oscar Zarate / A&Z, Introducing Lenin and the Russian Revolution /Lenin for Beginners (1977)

Woche 3.: 4. Mai

• Leo TrotzkiErgebnisse und Perspektiven (1906)

+ Tariq Ali and Phil Evans, Introducing Trotsky and Marxism / Trotsky for Beginners (1980)


Woche 4.: (Termin wird bekannt gegeben)

• W.I. LeninStaat und Revolution (1917)

Lenin, Sozialismus und KriegI. Kapitel:Die Grundsätze des Sozialismus und der Krieg 1914/1915(1915)


Woche 5.: 18.05

• Rosa LuxemburgWas will der Spartakusbund? (1918)

 Rosa Luxemburg, Unser Programm und die politische Situation (1918)

+ LuxemburgDie Ordnung herrscht in Berlin (1919)
+ Sebastian HaffnerDie deutsche Revolution 1918/19 (1968)

Woche 6.: 25.05

 W.I. LeninDer „Linke Radikalismus“, die Kinderkrankheit im Kommunismus (1920)

+ Lenin, Notizen eines Publizisten (1922/24)


Woche 7.: 01.06

• Lukács, “Der Standpunkt des Proletariats” (= Teil III. des Kapitels “Die Verdinglichung und das Bewußtsein des Proletariats”) In: Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein (1923)


Woche 8.: 08.06

• Leo Trotzki, 1917 – Die Lehren des Oktobers (1924)


Woche 9.: 15.06

• epigraphs by Louis Menand (on Edmund Wilson) and Peter Preuss (on Nietzsche) on the modern concept of history
+ Bertolt Brecht, “An die Nachgeborenen” (1939)
+ Benjamin, Erfahrung und Armut (1933)
+ Benjamin, Theologisch-politisches Fragment (1921/39?)
+ Benjamin, Zum Planetarium (aus: Einbahnstraße, 1928)
• Walter Benjamin, Über den Begriff der Geschichte (1940)
• BenjaminParalipomena zu den Thesen Über den Begriff der Geschichte (In: GS I) (1940)
• Max Horkheimer“Autoritärer Staat” (1940/42)

Woche 10: 22.06

• Theodor AdornoReflexionen zur Klassentheorie (1942)
• AdornoAusschweifungen (1944–47)
+ Adorno, “Zuneigung”, “Vor Mißbrauch wird gewarnt” und “Zum Ende”, aus: Minima Moralia(1944–47)
+ Horkheimer und Adorno, Diskussion über Theorie und Praxis (1956)

Woche 11 29.06

+ Adorno, “Zu Subjekt und Objekt” (1969)
• Adorno“Marginalien zu Theorie und Praxis” (1969)
• Adorno“Resignation” (1969)
+ Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, correspondence on the German New Left (1969)
+ Esther Leslie, Introduction to the 1969 Adorno-Marcuse correspondence (1999)
+ Adorno, “Spätkapitalismus oder Industriegesellschaft?” (1968)